Welcome to London Discovery Tours

Posts Tagged ‘Earl of essex’

Legal London walks - Lord Russell

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

In our previous blog on Saturday evening we told of the events leading up to the execution of William Lord Russell and told which of our London walks feature Lincoln’s Inn Fields, the site of the execution.

We ended by telling how Lord Howard was giving nhis evidence at the trail when news of the death of the Earl of Essex was brought to the court. Pausing in his evidence he announced that he could not continue “till he had given vent to his grief in some tears.”

But he soon recovered and told his story, the gist of which was that Lord Russell had spoken of seizing the King’s guards.

At the outset of the trial Lord Russell was asked if he would like a clerk to take down the evidence for him.

He turned, looked round the court, and then smiled. Facing the judge, he replied, “No, my wife is here.”

Throughout the whole of the proceedings Lady Russell took notes of the evidence.
Pemberton, the prosecuting counsel, opened his case fairly for the prisoner, but appears to have been egged on by Bloody Judge Jeffreys, who browbeat Russell and his witnesses in his best bullying style.

The jury was a “packed” one. They lost no time in bring¬ing in a verdict against the prisoner.

On the morning of July 21st, 1685, Lord Russell was led out to his execution. Arriving at the scaffold, he handed the sheriff a paper with his valedictory statement.

In it he said he thought his sentence “very hard,” and that killing by forms of law was the worst kind of murder.

He made a short address to the spectators, knelt in devotion„ and laid his head on the block “without the least change of countenance.”

It transpired afterwards that Russell might have escaped from prison. Lord Cavendish and the Duke of Monmouth both offered to take his place long enough for him to get away, but he would not let them endanger themselves.

Bishops Burnet and Tillotson and his wife were with him to the last.

Lady Russell lived another forty years, mourning the death of her husband.

Lord Russell was the son of William, fifth Earl of Bedford. Bythe death of his elder brother he became heir to the Earldom. After travelling on the Continent he was recalled home by his father to assist in the restoration of Charles II.

So if you join us for one of our Dickens London walks, or Legal London Walking tours you will most certainly see the spot where this eexecution took place.

A London Execution - Legal Walks.

Saturday, July 18th, 2009

Our Legal London walks invariably take you through Lincoln’s Inn Fields, which was once one of the capital’s execution grounds.

It would be difficult to find a more glaring injustice than the conviction and execution of Lord Russell for alleged complicity in the Rye House Plot.

In Lincoln’s Inn Fields, which we pass through on our Legal London walks, a tablet marks the spot where Russell met his death with the serenity of a hero and the demeanour of an innocent man.To the end he was comforted by the ministrations of his wife.

Rye House Plot was the name given to the abortive conspiracy to murder Charles II and his brother James, Duke of York, in 1683. Rye House was an isolated house near Hoddesdon, in Hertfordshire. The scheme of the plotters was to murder the royal brothers as they returned from Newmarket to London.

The authorities were warned by informers, and several arrests were made, including Lord Russell, Algernon Sidney, the Earl of Essex, and John Hampden.

These four were charged with forming a council of six to organize an insurrection. The other members of the council were the Duke of Monmouth and Lord Howard.

Essex, who might have made his escape, but preferred to stand by Russell, was afterwards found dead with his throat cut in the Tower of London.

Howard, who appears to have known more about the plot than anyone, was arrested in his house. He was found hiding inside a chimney.

He turned King’s Evidence and disclosed that Lord Shaftesbury had plotted a revolt by the City, that a party of soldiers were to be brought from Taunton, and that a council of six, of which he was one, had been deputed to make the arrangements.

Lord Howard was one of the chief witnesses against Russell, but there is good reason to believe that his evidence was false. An old soldier named Rumbold, also one of the leaders of the plot, testified against Russell.

Lord Russell was brought to his trial on the day that the Earl of Essex was found dead. When the news was brought to the court, Lord Howard was giving his evidence. He stopped, and said that he could not go on “till he had given vent to his grief in some tears.”

Our London Walking Tours that feature Lincoln’s Inn Fields include our Dickens London walks and our Legal London Tour.

We will continue with the story of William Lord Russell in Wednesdays Blog.

A Spot of Bother For Shakespeare

Saturday, April 18th, 2009

April 23rd is approaching, a date which is something of a double celebration. Not only is it St George’s Day, but it is also Shakespeare’s birthday.

In the lead up to this auspicious occasion we will be undertaking several Shakespeare’s London walks which will look at different aspects of the City that he knew.

Needles to say several of those London Walking Tours will pass the Ne Globe Playhouse which stands on the south bank of the River Thames opposite St. Paul’s Cathedral.

One of the stories we tell on our Shakespeare London walk is how William Shakespeare inadvertently found himself embroiled in a notorious plot to remove Elizabeth 1st from the throne of England. The events, as far as Shakespeare’s involvement was concerned, actually centred on the original Globe Playhouse, which stood a few Streets behind the New Globe, the site of which is covered on several of our London walks around Southwark.

It was at this Playhouse that many of Shakespeare’s plays received their first airing and it was here that Shakespeare found himself inadvertently embroiled in the aforementioned plot that could have had fatal consequences for him.

On Friday 6th February 1601, some of the Earl of Essex’s followers turned up at the Globe and requested that Shakespeare’s play Richard 11 be given a special performance the following afternoon.

The actors replied that the play was now an old one and unlikely to attract an audience. Essex’s men promised to indemnify the players against any loss that they might incurr and so at three O’clock on the Saturday afternoon the play, which deals with the deposing and killing of a monarch, went ahead.

What Shakespeare and his fellow players didn’t know was that the play was to be a rallying call for Essex’s followers to rise up in revolt, in order that he might seize the city and ultimately the throne of England, with Essex then ruling as Lord Protector.

Although Essex gave explicit instructions that the Queen was not to be harmed, one of his supporters later claimed that they had agreed to “draw blood from herself” should their coup fail.

Throughout the night of 7th February Essex and his followers made their preparations to seize the City of London.

The next morning he and several hundred followers rode into the City. But no sooner had he got there than a herald proclaimed him a traitor, and his supporters began to fall away. Racing back to his home in Essex the crestfallen nobleman realised that the game was up and, having burnt any incriminating documents, he gave himself up. On February 25th , Ash  Wednesday he was beheaded at the Tower of London.

Shakespeare’s company were suspected of being involved in the rebellion, but they argued that since they had been requested to put on the play at the request of their betters -  all of whom were Lords and Knights of the realm - it would have been unseemly to refuse.

Luckily their innocence was accepted and they were even summoned to court to perform before the Queen. We don’t know which play they presented but it would have been typical of the Queen’s sardonic sense of humour to have requested that they perform the play that had been intended as the rallying call for rebellion - Richard 11.